GIF to Pikchr conversion critique: encode10.gif
(1) By Warren Young (wyoung) on 2020-09-30 08:49:20 [source]
I converted this: https://fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/5251d44f3a35ae/www/encode10.gif
to this:
TARGET: [ down "Target" bold box fill palegreen width 150% height 200% "Processed" GI: box same as first box fill yellow height 25% "Gap → Insert" CC: box same fill orange height 200% "Common → Copy" W: box same as GI fill lightgray width 125% height 200% "Window" bold box same as CC height 125% "" box same fill white "" ] [ "Base" bold ; right ; arrow 33% ] with .e at TARGET.GI.nw [ "Slide" bold ; right ; arrow 33% ] with .e at TARGET.W.nw ORIGIN: [ down "Origin" bold B1: box fill white B2: box fill orange height 200% B3: box fill white height 200% ] with .nw at 0.75 right of TARGET.ne arrow from TARGET.W.e to ORIGIN.B2.w "Signature" aligned above→ /pikchrshow
Is this good, sensible, and idiomatic, or does it look like babble to people who actually speak PIC? :)
By the way, the raw hyperlink above is because there is no "fossil" interwiki tag here. With it, I could have placed the old GIF image inline directly.
(2) By drh on 2020-09-30 09:42:14 in reply to 1 [link] [source]
I think the PIC code looks great. And the resulting diagram is way better than the original GIF (which was presumably generated using a point-and-click drawing tool of some kind.) What's not to like here? This seems like a great example to demonstrate the power and utility of PIC/Pikchr.
(3) By Andreas Kupries (akupries) on 2020-09-30 16:13:17 in reply to 2 [link] [source]
I believe that the original is one of my pictures, from when I documented fossil's delta compression ages ago. I actually do not remember any-more how I created the original. It may very well have been a point-and-click tool.
I like the re-imagining in PIKchr as well.
Thanks to Warren for doing this.